Andrew and Nathan return for a pre-holiday special to clear the queue of listener questions left over from their recent livestream. They dive deep into the intersection of creativity and logic, debating whether AI art can ever possess a soul and discussing how scientific thinkers are often misunderstood by the public.
Andrew and Nathan sit down to tackle the questions they didn’t have time to answer. The conversation begins with a look at the blurring lines between art, science, and technology, arguing that the most successful creators are those who can operate in all three circles.
The hosts then move into a philosophical debate regarding Artificial Intelligence: is AI-generated imagery just “noise dressed up pretty,” or can it eventually claim to have a soul? They also explore the frustration of scientific misrepresentation in the media and the “change fatigue” that comes with modern tech life—specifically targeting the recent design updates in iOS.
Finally, they discuss the concept of timelessness in art. Is beauty subjective, or is it mathematically wired into our biology? Andrew explains how patterns like the Fibonacci sequence suggest a universal standard for beauty that transcends culture.
The episode wraps up with personal advice on handling professional burnout and where to focus your mental energy going into 2025.
Watch us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXRGtmpZxjU
Watch or listen to our recorded live stream: https://3reate.com/podcast/does-ai-benefit-humanity-ai-on-trial-youtube-live-stream-3reate/
Support the pod:
Listen:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/3reate/id1723426314 https://open.spotify.com/show/48Y2M7Ppja43Uq2wlyUtPF
Chapters:
(00:00) Answering leftover questions from the livestream.
(00:30) Are art, science, and tech blending?
(03:42) Debating if AI art has soul.
(06:19) How scientific thinkers get misrepresented.
(11:32) Defining what makes art truly timeless.
(13:00) The golden ratio and universal beauty.
(17:23) Managing burnout and constant industry change.
